INTRODUCTION
With this 2004 edition of ALTERNATIVE TEACHER CERTIFICATION:
A State-by-State Analysis, the National Center
for Education Information (NCEI) takes a bold step in clarifying
and defining
alternative routes to teacher certification.
NCEI has been tracking this issue since 1983, when New Jersey
first began discussions about developing an avenue whereby liberal
arts graduates would be aggressively recruited for teaching.
What we have documented in this annual publication since 1990 are the alternative
routes to the traditional approved college teacher education program route
for certifying teachers. Since the states have sole authority for certifying
teachers, we rely on the data and information submitted by certification offices
in each state. The numbers have grown substantially in the last two decades.
States have identified as alternative routes everything from newly created
certification routes designed specifically for nontraditional candidates to
emergency certificates.
In 1991, NCEI developed a classification system, A through I, and has since
added J and K, to further distinguish among routes that states have identified
as alternatives to traditional certification. In previous editions of this
publication, we published all of the alternative routes identified as such
by the states after which we assigned classifications. The publication grew
from 170 pages in 1990, to 446 in 2003. The number of “alternate routes” described
in the publication grew from 70 to 144 during that time period.
No one denies there has been tremendous growth in the development of alternate
routes. However, there is distortion in the numbers. For example, several states
have renamed certifcation routes they have had for years “alternate routes”,
some are now calling M.A.T. (Master in the Arts of Teaching) programs “alternate
routes”, and others consider anything short of completion of a traditional
college-based teacher preparation program an “alternate route.”
While this proliferation has been going on, a growing number of states have
gone back to the drawing board and designed avenues to certification, which
specifically meet the needs of growing numbers of postbaccalaureate candidates,
many of whom have had careers in other fields, and who now want to teach.
As more and more states have developed these new alternative routes, similar
characteristics have evolved. Candidates who get certified to teach through
these routes:
- Have at least a bachelor’s degrees.
- Pass a rigorous screening process, such as passing tests,
interviews, and demonstrated mastery of content to be taught.
- Begin teaching – usually full-time – early. They
engage in on-the-job training.
- Take any coursework or equivalent experiences in professional
education studies while teaching.
- Work with mentor teachers.
- Meet high performance standards.
In order to further clarify what alternative routes truly are,
and to not only distinguish among them, but to also separate
them from programs that are not really alternate routes, per
se, this 2004 edition of ALTERNATIVE TEACHER CERTIFICATION:
A State-by-State Analysis lists descriptions of the avenues to
teaching by classification of the alternate routes to teacher
certification.
Part I includes only Class A and Class B Alternate Routes to
Teacher Certification. These alternative routes meet these criteria:
CLASS A:
Since these avenues
to teacher certification have been designed specifically
to meet the needs of talented individuals
from
non-traditional backgrounds who want to teach,
NCEI considers only these to be
true alternative routes to teacher certification.
A summary of the entry
requirements and the program
requirements for the 31 such routes can be found by clicking on their links.
PART II includes only Class C Alternate Routes to Teacher Certification
that meet the following criteria:
CLASS C:
PART III includes only Class D and Class E Alternate Routes
to Teacher Certification that are housed at and/or
controlled by institutions of higher education, some of which
lead to
a Master’s degree and some which lead to certification
after college courses and other requirements are met,
and that meet the following criteria:
CLASS D:
PART IV includes only Class H and Class K Alternate Routes
to Teacher Certification that are avenues to certification
for specific
populations of candidates, e.g., Teach for America, Troops
To Teachers, college professors who want to teach in
K-12 schools,
or distinguished scholars in a field.
CLASS H:
PART V includes only Class G Alternate Routes to Teacher
Certification that exist to enable individuals who
need to fulfill missing
requirements for regular certification in the state.
For example, a teacher moving from one state to another.
CLASS G:
PART VI lists the states that report they are not currently
implementing any type alternate route to teacher certification.
CLASS I:
Additional changes in the 2004 edition of Alternative Teacher
Certification: A State-by-State Analysis include:
I also take this opportunity to announce the
formation of the separate organization, the
National Center for Alternative Certification
(NCAC), which NCEI established in fall 2003
with an unsolicited
discretionary grant award from the U.S. Department
of Education. See pages 14 – 15 for
the goals and objectives of the Center. All
of the material in this publication, as well
as additional
information concerning alternative routes
to certification, can be found on the NCAC
web site, www.teach-now.org.
We wish to thank the many people who made this
project possible, especially those in every
state agency of education who answered
our questions, who put up with our numerous
telephone calls, e-mails, faxes and mailings
and came through with the information
that makes this manual so valuable. They have
enabled us to tell the current and complete
story of alternative routes to teacher
certification in the United States.
Emily Feistritzer
February 26, 2004